🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked viewers in Australia from seeing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the eSafety commissioner applied to the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. It first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the regulator to instruct platforms to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

Arguing its case, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the surrounding crowd.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of public importance that prompted extensive public discourse". The platform even compared the footage and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the classification panel concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with different editing might have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the board changed the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the board disagreed, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the comparison to the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as that footage was made public long after the assassination, "once emotions around the matter had subsided".

Response Following the Decision

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the ruling.

"X fought this decision to defend free speech and the critical nature of public access about issues of public interest. We remain committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator acknowledged the ruling, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material being displayed to users under 18".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the regulator did not issue formal notices to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they had not met the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been instructed to apply sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.