🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed the progressive this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. So there was a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.