🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined a collective professional network test this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."