Conversing Across the Gap: Viewpoints on Immigration and Culture
Meeting the Individuals
Stephen, sixty-four, Essex
Occupation: Former insurance professional
Voting record: Usually Tory, except when he lived in a left-leaning London borough and voted for the SDP
Amuse bouche: His focus in insurance was hostage situations: “Everyone always says that insurance is boring, but it’s not when you’re planning rescuing people from South Korea because the North Koreans have activated the missile silos”
Evie, 25, the capital
Occupation: Graduate in psychology
Voting record: In her native land, New Zealand, she supported both Labour and Green
Interesting fact: Eva has been employed as a singer on ocean liners; her longest trip was six months, which is a significant duration to be on a boat
Initial impressions
She: Steve appeared there to have a nice time, to be receptive
Steve: She seemed like a very intelligent, well-spoken, pleasant person
Eva: I had a caprese salad, pasta with fungi, and a rich sweet treat, it was very good
The big beef
Eva: He was definitely on the side of immigration being curtailed. He thinks that UK residents who are native to the area, including non-white white British, don’t have as much access to the things that they need, because more and more people are arriving. Whereas I just don’t think the numbers are so problematic
Steve: I’m for skilled immigration, I have no desire to reside in a white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant country with warm beer. But I maintain that authorities have used immigration to occupy positions they struggle to staff without raising wages. Pay are suppressed, so taxes have to be kept low, so we can’t do things better – spend more money on childcare, on schooling, on technology
She: I am not deeply informed of the EU referendum, because I was 16 and abroad when it occurred. He clarified it to me in a new light. He told me about “posted workers” – people could arrive in the UK and receive solely the salary of the their nation of origin
Steve: Macron spent 24 months getting the EU to do away with the system; it was revised in 2018. Before that, posted workers coming in were undermining local employees. Under Gordon Brown, it was oil workers that were imported; since then it’s been hospitality, agriculture. She understood that, because she’d worked on a passenger vessel and said she was earning significantly higher than international colleagues
Sharing plate
Steve: It would be ideal to have a alternative power, come off of oil. I don’t like pollution, I value fresh atmosphere, I appreciate rural areas. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their energy revenues soared after the conflict began, they used that money to build eco-friendly systems
Eva: So we’re dependent on their petroleum. You can see that’s an unfavorable approach to proceed. He was in favour of continuing our own oil exploration for the small amount we’ll require in the future. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to rely on air travel. We both think we should be advancing to greener solutions, windfarms and hydro
Dessert topics
She: We touched on Islamophobia, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed concerned about extremism coming here – he did note that a many individuals in the Arab world were extremist, which I didn’t think fair. I think it’s prejudiced to form opinions based on religion
He: I come from the eastern part of London. I asked her if she’d been to that district, and she said it had been gentrified. Obviously, I would say that: full of yuppies. But when I go down that local market, I look like a foreigner. People stare at me because it’s become very Muslim. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she doesn’t like that word, to her it implies poverty. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I consented to substitute a alternative term – maybe community?
Eva: I feel like Muslim people are really overrepresented in the news outlets as engaging in misconduct. It seems a little bit discriminatory, or prejudiced against foreigners
Conclusion
He: I think we separated amicably. We had a embrace at the station
Eva: We both said that we’d had a lovely time